User talk:Mglerner: Difference between revisions

From PyMOLWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[User:Inchoate|Tree]] 15:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Inchoate|Tree]] 15:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
: cool!--[[User:Mglerner|-michael]] 16:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
: cool!--[[User:Mglerner|-michael]] 16:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Problem with Tools2
Hi Mike,
Trying your new APBS tools2 plugin.  First I noticed that the isopotential surface it creates with the same PDB and PQR is different to that produced from APBS original version.  Second, when I tried to raytrace a usual scene with a protein cartoon with two isopotential surfaces, it processed for 20% and then crashed, complaining about a python error. The original APBS tools does not crash.  I am using Pymol 1.2r3 for windows (vista).  Anyway thanks for making such a nice tools.
Wai
Hi Wai,
Can you give me an example PDB/PQR file to reproduce the discrepancies you're seeing with isopotential surfaces?

Latest revision as of 13:27, 16 June 2010

Michael,

Check out Fetch_Path for a cool setting. I don't use load much now b/c of this.

Tree 15:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

cool!---michael 16:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Problem with Tools2

Hi Mike,

Trying your new APBS tools2 plugin. First I noticed that the isopotential surface it creates with the same PDB and PQR is different to that produced from APBS original version. Second, when I tried to raytrace a usual scene with a protein cartoon with two isopotential surfaces, it processed for 20% and then crashed, complaining about a python error. The original APBS tools does not crash. I am using Pymol 1.2r3 for windows (vista). Anyway thanks for making such a nice tools.

Wai

Hi Wai,

Can you give me an example PDB/PQR file to reproduce the discrepancies you're seeing with isopotential surfaces?